Posts from the “Off the Field” Category

Still Behind, Still Predicting

Ok guy (that is, if anyone is still reading), I know we’re behind.  I know we’ve been “bad bloggers” this season, but perhaps it’s because there’s other things we’re doing with our time.  When you’re watching baseball games every night, it’s hard to concentrate on what’s going on on the TV AND to write a blog post.  And then there are the non-baseball things going on in our lives.  In any case, Drew and I are still making predictions, and while I haven’t gotten around to rounding up our July predictions (super quick summary: we weren’t quite optimistic enough), we’re going to put in our August predictions before the month gets too far ahead of us.  And because we’re going for speed here, there won’t be pictures (at least for a little bit).

July 31-Aug 2: vs Phillies

Maggie: I’m thinking at least 2.  They’re having a crappy year, and showing it, but the Nats do have to face Cliff Lee.  (2-1)

Drew: The Phillies team that got swept by the Braves isn’t going to be the team that plays the Nats at the end of July.  2-1, a sweep, both sound good to me. What I care about more is how I don’t dread the Phillies fans this season.  They don’t come to the park with their usual swag and obnoxiousness.  I’m looking forward to the game on the 31st.  Should be a quiet night. [Addendum: After the debacle that wast the first game, I still think the Nats will take 2 of the three games (up 2-1 as I write). However, the Nats showed me some things last night that make me take pause.] (2-1)

Aug 3-5: vs Miami (including doubleheader on the 3rd)

Maggie: We’re playing them at home (as opposed to Miami, where they historically cream us), so I’m happy enough to say (3-1)

Drew: This is another team that will look very different than the last time the Nats played them. I think that Miami’s grand experiment can’t quiet be called a failure yet. Being 14 games back is bad but i still think they might pull out a better record this year than last season.  However, the Marlins are only playing middling baseball. Their FIP and opp. BABIP are middle of the pack as is their offense.  Maggie is right, 3-1 makes sense. (3-1)

Aug 6-9: @ Houston

Maggie: All my past predictions have been so cautious.  They have more losses than we do wins.  I’ll go with a big series win.  (3-1)

Drew: Go BIG Maggie! I’m going with a sweep. Why? Why not!  Interestingly, the Astros have scored runs than the the Marlins. However, they give up runs like Goldman execs get options.  The Nats’ offense has woken up as of late so I’m expecting the pitching to hold off the Astros for a sweep. (4-0)


Aug 10-12: @ Arizona

Maggie: For whatever reason, the Diamondbacks make me wary.  I’ll go with (1-2)

Drew: I do think the the D-backs are going to be a challenge for the Nats.  The Dbacks don’t seem to have much of the Nats’ current bane: Speed. They’re near the bottom in stolen bases and are benefiting from a .317 BABIP from playing in a division with terrible defense.  I see them as the roughly .500 team they are and don’t expect much trouble on the Nats’ part. (2-1)

Aug 13-15: @ San Fran

Maggie: SF Worries me too, but if I’m going to be optimistic, I’m going to be optimistic. (2-1)
Drew: I’m going the opposite way. It’s been a while since the Nats had a west coast swing and the Giants are playing a lot better than last time.  They’re pitching is much improved and their offense seems to be succeeding in playing small ball. That makes me worried because while the Nat’s haven’t been giving up a lot of homeruns, they’ve been losing games on the base paths.  I’m going to say the Nats go 1-2 for this series. (1-2)

Aug 17-19: vs NY Mets

Maggie: This is the right time of year for a late season Mets collapse.  (3-0)
Drew: That’s the boldness I like to see! I, however, do not share your optimism. The Mets have a better offense than I think their record suggests. Their pitiching is only middling with the exception of R.A. Dickey.  I think this series could really go either way but because it’s at home, I’ll say the Nats go (2-1)

Aug 20-22: vs Atlanta

Maggie: I think it would be silly to count Atlanta out since they’re the last team other than the Nats that seems to have any spark in the NL East.  I’ll say Nats win the series, but it wouldn’t surprise me if Atlanta took it instead. (2-1)

Drew: Completely agree. The Braves are my new nemesis.  Despite growing up in Atlanta, I will never root for the Braves.  I think the biggest question will be if Chipper plays in this series.  If he doesn’t (and I hope he doesn’t) then I give the Nats a much better chance of going 2-1. Otherwise it’s a coin flip in my book. (2-1)

Aug 24-26: @ Philly

Maggie: A group of Nats fans will be visiting CBP on Saturday night, and I’ve got high hopes they leave happy.  I say we sweep the series.  (3-0)

Drew: Multiple sweeps! At this point, the Phillies will be at their most dangerous.  By this time they should be close to being eliminated from the playoffs and will be playing for the hell of it (and gobs of cash).  I say they actually have an uptick in performance as a result and take 2 from the Nats.  (1-2)

Aug 28-29: @ Miami

Maggie: Visiting Miami has never been the Nats strong suit.  Thank goodness it’s only a 2 game series! (1-1)

Drew: Can them fish! Sweep! (2-0)

Aug 30-Sept 2: vs St Louis (series continues over the weekend, and the homestand deep into September, no good place to cut off)

Maggie: The Cards are one of those more historically (well, recently historically?) dominant teams.  I don’t see them fading off into the autumn light.  I should end my optimistic month with a won series, but I’ll call it a split. (2-2)

Drew: A four game series with the Cardinals will be a late season treat. The Reds are going to run away with the division but I think the Cards will fight hard for that extra wildcard spot. I don’t think they’ll catch the Nats (if they don’t win the division) but it will be a challenge none the less. A split would be a nice outcome but I think there’s a real chance the Nats go (3-1)


Final Total

Maggie: a ridiculous 22-10.

Drew: identically crazy 22-10

So – are we totally nuts for imagining a 22-10 run over the month of August (plus 1 day in July and 2 in September)?  Let us know your predictions in the comments!

Mid-Season Assessment: “At least we were right about one thing…”

The Nationals start the second half of what seems like a beautiful season so far tonight.  Back in early April, we posted our predictions for the coming season.  I was fairly optimistic, and Ashley tempered my optimism.  And apparently, we shouldn’t have been quite so moderate in our guesstimations.  Let’s take a look at those prognostications and see just how things stand here before the Nats start up again.


1) Who will lead the Nats in home runs in 2012?

Original Answer: Ryan Zimmerman
Current Leaders: Desmond at 17, LaRoche at 15 … Zimmerman 8

Oh Ryan.  He had a rough first half, and things didn’t turn around until about 3 weeks ago when he got that cortisone shot.  In the mean time, Desmond is having a career season, and Adam LaRoche is getting off to a faster start than usual.
Modified Answer: LaRoche – I’m not sure Desmond can keep up his furious pace through the rest of the season though I’d love to see him try.

2) Who will lead the Nats in RBI?

Original Answer: Danny Espinosa
Current Leaders: LaRoche 53, Desmond 51… Espinosa 24

This prediction was probably wishful thinking in the first place.  Espi had a great first half last year – would it be silly to think he’d repeat?  Maybe he’ll bounce back in the second half this time around, but it looks like it’ll be difficult to catch up with LaRoche and Desi who are running away with this so far.
Modified Answer: If we’re going with the “second place guy takes it” again, then we’ll give it to Desmond.

3) Who will lead the Nats in stolen bases?

Original Answer: Roger Bernadina
Current Leaders: Espinosa 14, Desmond 11, Harper 10 … Bernadina 8

This is a situation where the Shark’s new role as a pinch hitter has hurt him.  He’s still a speedster, as evidenced by the fact that he’s only 6 bases behind Espinosa despite his fractional number of plate appearances.
Modified Answer: Gotta give this one to the Kid.  Harper loves to run, and I have a feeling he’ll do a lot of base stealing in the second half.

4) Who will lead the staff in wins?

Original Answer: Jordan Zimmermann
Current Leaders: Gonzalez 12, … Zimmermann 5

Poor Jordan.  We should have known from last year that the team’s bad habit of not giving him any run support would hold over.  He deserves a better win-loss record (and fingers crossed tonight gives him another W in that column).
Modified Answer: Gotta go with Gio.  He’s a workhorse, and he seems to love pitching in Nats Park.  I have a feeling this one is locked up.


5) Who will pitch more innings for the Nats this season: Chien-Ming Wang, John Lannan, Ross Detwiler?

Original Answer: Ross Detweiler
Current Leaders: Detweiler 78.2, Wang 23.2, Lannan 0

This is one of the few answer’s we’ve got right so far.  Yay us!  With Wang’s hip acting up again, and Lannan pouting in Syracuse, we’ll stick with our original answer.


6) Who will get more at bats for the Nats this season:  Rick Ankiel, Roger Bernadina, Bryce Harper?

Original Answer: Roger Bernadina
Current Leaders: Harper 248, Ankiel 158, Bernadina 111

With Ankiel in a reduced role, Bernadina as pinch hitter, and Harper debuting in the big leagues WAY before anyone expected, it looks like we were wrong on this one.
Modified Answer: Harper.  He’s run away with it so far, and the only way I see this changing is if the worst comes to pass.


7) Date of Bryce Harper’s Major league debut?

Original Answer: June 2
Actual Answer: April 28

We were OH SO WRONG.  But really…whoulda thunk?  And dude is really proving himself.

8) Which minor leaguer are you most interested in keeping tabs on this season (other than Bryce Harper)?

Original Answer: Anthony Rendon or Matt Purke (btw, check out that photo!)

With Rendon essentially out for the season with a broken ankle, and Matt Purke not starting his season until late May followed quickly by a trip to the DL, it seems that both of them won’t be doing much for a while.  In the mean time, we’ll be keeping an ear to the ground about Alex Meyer who did an awesome job at the MLB futures game.

9) How many all-stars will the Nats have?  Who?

Our Answer: 2, Zimmerman and Strasburg
Real Answer: 3.5, Strasburg, Gonzalez, Desmond (withdrew), Harper

Let’s give ourselves partial credit.  Of course Strasburg would go – that was the obvious answer.  But the other 2.5 (we’ll call them that since the Nats technically had 4 all stars, but only 3 showed up) were awesome surprises.  Congrats to the team on making the great leap from the last few seasons when they had someone at the All Star Game only because every team HAD to have someone at the All Star Game.

10) Total wins and what place in the division?

Original Answer: 85, 2nd
Current Answer: 49 wins, 1st in NL-East, 1st in NL, 3rd in MLB … more than halfway there!

This is amazing.  The team currently stands 10 wins behind their entire win total from both 2008 and 2009.  They’ve got 79 more games to win the 36 games needed to meet our prediction.  That’s .456 over the second half of the season.  It’d have to be a big drop-off on the current pace, but that means this team is likely to at least meet and probably exceed our expectations.
We won’t amend our prediction (just because we’re cautious), but yeah.  This is very good.


Essay Question: Single most important development for the Nats this season?

Original Answer: The team really needs to stay healthy. Physically, this includes trying to avoid silly injuries early in the season that could be avoided and not overworking injury prone players. Mentally, the team needs to keep up camaraderie in the clubhouse and not get caught up in early season hype until they’ve proven themselves.

Response to Essay: DAMN STRAIGHT.  How many more games could this team have won early on if they’d had Morse from the get-go?  Had Storen as their closer, and didn’t have to deal with the nagging Lidge elbow-issues.  What if Zimmerman had gotten his cortisone shot earlier?  Or if Werth could have continued producing in his sophomore season without the devastating wrist injury?  If Desmond and Harper didn’t have nagging injuries that they’re playing through (to All-Star caliber), that might be holding them back from their full potential?  Who knows what would have happened…but it would have been fun to watch. Thankfully the camaraderie has been there to make up for the other failings.  This is a team with clubhouse chemistry like you would not believe, and they seem to be having fun, but also being realistic about expectations.  Good on them!

Ok – the second half starts now.  Good luck, boys!

June 2, 2012 – In Which We Make a Choice

Last Friday night was a rainout.  Stephen Strasburg was supposed to pitch, so for whatever reason, they decided to just shift his start to Saturday instead of skipping him in the lineup and having Gio Gonzalez pitch like he was supposed to.  This was VERY exciting for me.  I’ve had the “luck” this year of so far only seeing two of the Nationals – Gio and Edwin Jackson.  They’re both fantastic pitchers, and I’ve really enjoyed the games I’ve been to, but there have been 4 other guys taking the mound in the first inning, and I wanted to see someone else.  Seeing Strasburg would be a cherry on that cake.  I called Ashley, invited her to come with me, and said I’d pick her up at 2:30, with the expectation that we’d park my car at 3 or 3:15, get to the ballpark by 3:30, and buy ourselves some $5 beers before heading up to my seats.  This was not to be.  Traffic along the 270-spur and the beltway delayed my arrival to Ashley’s house until 3:10.  We got on US-50 (because every other route into the city was clogged) and made our way towards 395…only to be greeted with standstill traffic when we reached that on-ramp.  We looked at traffic on Google Maps, listened to WTOP, and tried to make a detour through Arlington.  We called my mother, and it was at that time (4:00pm) that I made the executive decision that I wasn’t going to sit in traffic for potentially hours to miss the game, and not even see Strassy pitch.  We would make alternate plans.

And so, it was with a heavy heart that Ashley and I drove back towards her apartment, but along the way, Ashley had a great idea.  If we couldn’t watch the game in person with cheap beer, we’d watch it on tv at a bar with GREAT beer.  So that’s how we ended up at Mad Fox Brewing Company in Falls Church.  If we couldn’t be at the game, this is where we wanted to be.  We enjoyed fantastic brews, amazing bartenders (who were sympathetic to our plight), and great people surrounding us at the bar who were interested in talking about the Nats.  Ashley was as happy as it was possible to be in our situation.

I was not.  In fact, I was so sulky, that as I drank my Diabolik Belgian Strong Ale, I kept a list of all the things that made me sad that I wasn’t at the game.  Here is that list:

  • Michael Morse returns (along with the return of a-ha’s Take on Me as his fantastic at bat music)
  • Strasburg (we’ve already discussed this)
  • Beautiful day (probably the most obnoxious part of listening to the radio broadcasters was how many times they reiterated that it was beautiful, perfect baseball weather)
  • Zim in tall socks (we are suckers for this particular uniform choice)
  • Harper crazy eyeblack (from the TV it looked like it was worthy of high-school Harper)
  • Flores home run (I love to jump up and high five everyone around me)
  • Game time 2.5 hours for a win!!! (because 1) it’s a win, and 2) it’s short enough where you can still do stuff in the evening)

So that’s our excuse for not having a gamer for the June 2 game.  Do you think we made the right choice?  Has anyone around here ever sat in crazy traffic for hours for a Nats game?  Are there situations where I would have waited?  Sure – if it were a playoff game.  But it wasn’t.  Speaking of the traffic – does anyone know what caused the city-wide standstill on Saturday?

PS (top photo is honor of today – the 2 year Strasiversary!  Photos from that game here)

4 Comments

June Prediction Post – Part 1

Since the “Predict the Nats performance” post was such an interesting challenge (and since Drew and I did fairly well), I think a June prediction post is well in order.  The Nats have a challenging month ahead of them where they’ll be playing the entire American League East over the course of two and a half weeks.  But let’s not get ahead of ourselves.  Once again, we’ll be splitting the predictions in two, with the First Ladies taking the first post, and CTmD taking on the second.  Let’s get started!


Braves (vs June 1-3, @ 29-30, July 1)

Drew: I got a little carried away in my May preview with the ‘S’ word. I was thrilled to see the Nats actually get one sweep and take care of the Bravos in A-town.  These two series are still going to be tough.   I know the Braves have been struggling with injuries but so is everyone else. They’ve been pretty good team so far, with strong BB% and wOBA even with a mediocre pitching staff(1.03 HR/9 and 4.06 FIP). Despite that, I think the Nats have this group of Braves number. Since last season the Nats have played really well against the Braves. I’m going to say the Nats go 2-1 in both series and wind up 4-2 for June.

Maggie: This coming week is a big opportunity for the Nationals.  They’ll be facing two division rivals, and one of those is the Braves, who they just swept.  The Nats will (hopefully!) be getting some players back from the DL (can you say Michael Morse?), so they’ll continue to win.  But after a long division road trip, I’m thinking they’ll be tired and don’t see them sweeping the Braves again.  By the time we get to the end of the month, the Braves should have more players back and the Nats will be playing at Turner field again.  I have a feeling this will be a turning point for Atlanta, so I’m only giving the Nats 1.  (2-1, 1-2; 3-3 for the month).


Mets (vs June 5-7)

Drew: I’m still not sure I can buy the Mets as real.  Their defense is pretty shaky with a .307 BABIP (3rd highest in the NL), they still give up more than HR per game, they strike out 21% of the time(5th most in all of baseball), and they’ve actually given up more runs than they’ve scored (214-234). These are not the makings of a winning team.  No matter how they keep winning I can’t believe this team is for real until some of those stats take a more positive turn. I’m going to agree with Maggie on this one and go 2-1.

Maggie: The Mets have been a real surprise this season – maybe more so than the Nationals since everyone was still ragging on them at the beginning of the season and was talking up the Nats.  The Nats haven’t played them since their second series, so I have a feeling it will be close, but as a homer, I’ll give the Nats a slight edge. (2-1)


Red Sox (@ June 8-10)

Drew: No one in Boston was really jazzed about the Sox over memorial day. They dropped 2 of 3 to the Rays and there isn’t much buzz. The thing is, they’re not playing terribly. Yeah, they’re last in their division but they’re over .500. In most other divisions they’d be competing for second.  They’re offense seems to be performing with a solid wOBA (3rd in the AL, 4th overall), a decent BB% (ok, they strike out a fair amount too).  Their pitching has been atrocious. The Nats have been a little bit inconsistent  bat wise but I’m still going to pick their pitching to carry this one and say 2-1. I’d like to see a little revenge for April 3rd.

Maggie: The Red Sox have been really struggling this year.  Of course, struggling in the AL East means sitting at .500 and still being in 5th place.  This is definitely not the team that dominated for a stretch in the mid-aughts, so I’m giving the young and surging Nats a slight edge here (though it will be close playing at Fenway). (2-1)


Blue Jays (@ June 11-13)

Drew: I have no idea what to make of the Blue Jays (really resisting the urge to call them the BJs).  They’re playing about as expected from a run production stand point.  But since they’re in the AL, and Canadian I don’t know anything else about them. Flipping a coin here aaannnnddd….. 1-2. Nats gotta lose some time right?

Maggie: The Blue Jays are another team that have “struggled” this year (though currently sitting just over .500), but they haven’t had a real signature dominant win within their division.  I was originally thinking the Nats would take just 1, but will bump that up to 2 since they may have a decent cheering section considering the franchise’s former base in Canada. (2-1)

We’ll finish things out tomorrow!

1 Comment

May Predictions – UPDATE!

Back in the beginning of May, Drew and I made some predictions about how the Nationals would fare in the coming month.  Those posts are here and here.  We’ll be making predictions for June too, so be on the lookout for those posts this weekend!  Let’s take a look at how the Nats actually did, compare that with the predicted results, and assign 1 point for each correct series.

D-backs
Maggie: 1-2
Drew: 0-3
Actual: 2-1

Who knew that we were being too pessimistic?  This was a good start to a difficult month.

Phillies
Maggie: 2-1*, 1-2
Drew: 1-2, 2-1*
Actual: 2-1, 2-1

Both Drew and I score a point for accuracy by getting one of the series right – but obviously we didn’t know the extent of how injuries would depress the Philly’s play.

Pirates
Maggie: 2-1, 1-1*
Drew: 3-0, 1-1*
Actual: 1-2, 1-1

Ouch.  I guess we both forgot how strong the Pirates are when we play them at home, and we can’t overlook the fact that Andrew McCutcheon played strong those first few weeks of the month.  Still, one point apiece for predicting the split at home.

Reds
Maggie: 2-1 *
Drew: 0-3
Actual: 2-1

The Nats were really on a tear at this point, which was sort of surprising considering they’d just lost Jayson Werth and (when did LaRoche and Zimmerman come off the DL?).  One point to Maggie for being optimistic.

Padres.
Maggie: 2-0
Drew: 2-0
Actual: 1-1

We couldn’t sweep the Padres in San Diego, and couldn’t do it at home either.

Orioles
Maggie: 1-2 *
Drew: 2-1
Actual: 1-2

The O’s turned out to be a much stronger team than we thought.  Apart from the one close game, which the Orioles won, the other two were fairly lopsided.  One for each.  Point to Maggie for predicting that the lop would fall on the O’s side.

Braves
Maggie: 2-1
Drew: 2-1
Actual: 3-0

We both thought we were being quite optimistic with the 2-1 prediction against the Braves.  I guess the Nats had a few more uninjured players than the Braves, which let them take their first sweep of the year!

Marlins
Maggie: 2-1
Drew: 3-0
Actual: 0-3

Eeep!  Seriously – that’s not a fun outcome.  And watching those games wasn’t fun either.  Maybe it’s an end of the month thing (the Nats were swept by the Dodgers at the end of April), or maybe like Ross Detweiler said after the game, the Nats met a hot team at the time when they were hottest.

Total Record
Maggie: 16-12
Drew: 16-12
Actual: 15-13

Each off by one.  Not bad at all!  But for accuracy, Maggie wins this month with a score of 4 points to Drew’s 2.

May Predictions: Part 2!

So, yesterday we left off in mid-May with the Nats facing the Reds.  Fortunately for all of us, there are four more teams that the DC boys of summer will face before we actually head into summer months.  And since this May prediction is a co-post with Crunching Through My Day, we’ll let Drew pick up in the middle of the month and let us know how things should turn out for the Nats.

See that post HERE!

Joint May Prediction Post: First Ladies of Baseball and Crunching Through My Day

The Nats have been off to an awesome start in the month of April.  To end the month at 14-8 is somewhat unexpected.  Fans were optimistic before opening day, but I’m not sure that anyone would have predicted how many ways our boys on the field would find ways to win (despite the frustrating road trip to California).

And now we leave the first month, and we start to have some real data to work with instead of merely making guesses based on limited opportunities.  But because I’m not REALLY a baseball math person, I called up someone who is – Drew, husband of First Lady Ashley, who also writes a stats blog called Crunching Through My Day.  We’re going to try something new this month, and depending on how things go…this could be a semi-regular thing.  Let us know what you think, and we’ll see what happens.

The next month is going to be the Nats first real challenge.  Everyone said that their opening schedule was one where they had a chance to dominate, and clearly they did since they sit tied for first at the top of the NL leaderboard.  What we’re going to do is go series-by-series and using Maggie’s guts and Drew’s computer programs, try to predict how things will look by the end of the month.  We’ll address the first four teams the Nats will face in today’s post on FLoB, and the back half’s opponents tomorrow on Crunching Through My Day.


Arizona Diamondbacks – 5/1-3

Maggie:

Currently, the DBacks sit in the middle of the NL West with a record of 12-11.  After this series, the next time they’ll see the Nats is the middle of August, once things get interesting.  Last year the Nats were 2-5 against the D-backs who finished 1st in the NL West with a record of 94-68.  With that history and the back end of our rotation facing Arizona, I predict 1-2.

Drew:

The Dbacks are an enigma to me since I hear so little about them.  Looking at the #s this will be an interesting series for the Nats. Arizona’s pitching looks awful, allowing 1.09 HR/9 and a 4.01 FIP. 290 BABIP. The Pirates aren’t that bad.  However, their offense seems better than most.  This should be a real series with the Nats pitching strength pitted against their offense and their poor pitching against our abysmal offense.  After the series with the Dodgers, I’m going to say that our offense won’t get it done here.  One upping Maggie and saying a sweep.

Philadelphia Phillies – 5/4-6, 21-23

Maggie:

The Nationals will take on the Phillies twice in the month of May – during the first weekend of May for the highly touted “Our Park” initiative, followed by a trip to Citizens Bank Park towards the end of the month.  They’ll face the fury of Strasburg during the first series, and will see the middle of the rotation up in Philly.  I predict 2-1 for the first meeting, and 1-2 for the second (we’ll blame the Philthies for that) for an even 3-3 for the month of May.

Drew:

The Philthies suffered a huge set back this spring with Howard and Utley going on the DL.  While questions swirled about whether or not their pitching would be enough to carry them through the NL.  Through April, the results aren’t pretty.  The Phillies pitching staff has pitched pretty middling, with middle of the NL stats in K/9, BB/9 and BABIP (oddly enough, their FIP is 2nd in the NL behind the Nats).  Their offense has been fairly nondescript which probably explains their record.  While April results don’t have much bearing on post season outcomes, particularly for the Philthies, I’m not counting them out yet. Playing the Nats brings out the best in both teams (and the worst in Philthies fans).  For the two series, I’m going to say that there’s a split, with the Philthies taking 2 of the first 3 and the Nats taking the 2 of the last 3.

Pittsburgh Pirates – 5/8-10, 16-17

Maggie:

The Pirates are a team that I always feel bad for.  They haven’t had a winning season since 1992, and they’ve been dumped on for so long in a way that the Nationals only had to endure for a few seasons.  They’ll face off for a three game series in Pittsburgh, followed by a 2 game series a week later in DC.  I say 2-1 for the first series, and 1-1 for the second, leaving a prediction of 3-2 for the month.

Drew:

I agree with you Maggie. Despite the fact that Sid Bream sliding into home is still the most exciting baseball moment of my life (Braves win! Braves win!), I feel bad for the Pirates.  Even for a bad team, they’re underperforming.  The Pirates pitching is ok but their offense atrocious, falling near the bottom in BABP, H, HR, and K%. Pair that against the Nationals pitching and  I’m calling for a sweep in the first series and a split in the second.   Assuming the Nats actually hit, that is.

Cincinnati Reds – 5/11-13

Maggie:

The Nats played the Reds as their first home stand of the year and took 3 of 4.  If the Nats stay on top of their game, I bet we’ll see another win…even if they are playing this series in Ohio.  I predict: 2-1.

Drew:

While the Nats took 3 of 4 from the Reds at home, they got lucky.  Going into the 8th  inning of each game, the Nats’ win probability was 94.8, 21.6,  94.2, and 50.0.   Games 1, 2, and 4 went into extra innings and the Nats lost the last one. The Nats could have easily lost the first two of those games and we’d be looking at a very different season right now.  While the Reds haven’t been outstanding, they’ve got a core that’s as good as the Nats. I’m afraid the ball is going to bounce their way in the series. I’m going to be a downer here and say the baseball gods will smile on the Reds with a sweep.

We’ll finish up the rest of our thoughts tomorrow on Crunching Through My Day.  Be sure to check back for the thrilling finale (haha) where we reveal how we think the Nats will finish out the month.

5 Comments

A Little Something on the Eve of the Home Opener

I’m not a poet – not really.  But I wanted to write something to commemorate this wonderful feeling going into the home opener series for the Nats this year.  With my sincerest apologies to Clement Clarke Moore.

***

Twas the night before baseball, and all through DC
many bloggers were stirring, including me.
Our tickets were placed by the door with care,
knowing that soon they would be neckwear.

Fans of all ages, nestled snug in their beds,
while visions of double-plays danced in their heads.
And Ashley with her camera, and I with my cap,
were settling our brains for a last “pre-baseball” nap.

Early the next morning, there arose such a clatter,
I nearly stepped on my cat to see what was the matter.
Away to the window I flew like a flash,
Dealing only with mini-blinds – forget shutter and sash.

Screech

The sun shining down on all that’s in sight
made the day warm and lovely, unlike stadium light.
When what to my shocked eyes emerged from the layers
of trees, but SCREECH! with nine baseball players.

A grown man in costume of feathers and beak,
I knew it was him by his whistles and cheek.
The cheerful bald eagle – a local landmark -
was leading the players to Nationals Park

“Now Desmond, Gonzalez, Werth, Espinosa,
LaRoche, Z-man, Shark, Ramos, DeRosa!
To the top of the red porch, over the walls -
now hit away, hit – smash the heck outta those balls!”

The team made their way to Southwest DC,
moving more quickly than fans filled with glee.
On to the field, the players they ran,
with Screech on their heels, showing wingspan.

And then, brassy horns, I heard from homeplate,
the National Anthem (and no head of state).
I made my way down to my seats without hitch,
and settled down in time to see the first pitch!

They were dressed all in white, those men on the field,
sadly missing from the lineup were those who’d not healed.
We all kept our fingers crossed for Storen and Morse,
hoping that previous bad news would not get worse.

But Screech – how he pranced! His countenence so merry!
Matching uniform, shoes and shirt – all the shade of a cherry.
He waved to the fans, then faded into the crowd,
surely other fans elsewhere would need to be wowed.

We watched as the team took their place on the diamond,
the anticipation around us was certainly heightened.
They warmed up their throws from second to first,
thinking that this year was the year they’d no longer be worst.

The team, they were rag-tag – right odd if you please.
And yet they’d managed to take two from Cubbies.
They’d lost to the Mets, but come back to win -
No matter how punished, they would not give in.

Their backgrounds were varied from rookie to vet
but somehow, together, they were sure to reset.
With the game ’bout to start, expectations were high,
there was nothing left for our boys but to try.

So I settled back into my seat for the game,
looked ’round for Screech (but he was gone just the same)
But listening hard, I heard him say as he gave out the hats
“Happy Home Opener to all, and Let’s Go Nats!”

3 Comments

2012 Pre-Season Predictions

 

With the start of the season fast approaching (Yesterday was the last spring training game?  Tomorrow is opening day?  Eep!  Where has the time gone!), it means that the First Ladies are back with their pre-season predictions.  As members of the DC-Internet Baseball Writers of America, we participate in a survey every spring and an awards vote every fall.  We tend to like the predictions best because it’s something we can watch and judge ourselves against.  As a note, most of these predictions were made while the First Ladies were out of town, so if things seem slightly off…we’ll just blame foreign air.  Here’s our thoughts on this spring’s survey (which can be found here).


1) Who will lead the Nats in home runs in 2012?

Ryan Zimmerman

Zim seems to be back and healthy this spring (we’re very thankful for that), so with a full season ahead of him, we’re pretty sure he’ll make a mark.  And with that lovely extension – he’ll want to prove he’s worth every penny and more.


2) Who will lead the Nats in RBI?

Danny Espinosa

This is one that after watching the Nats-Red Sox game we’re beginning to question (Wilson Ramos looked REALLY good).  But now is not the time to go back on guesses.  After a fall that looked more crash-and-burn than rookie of the year, we think Danny will come back to the season with something to prove, and that may manifest itself in pushing guys across the plate.


3) Who will lead the Nats in stolen bases?

Roger Bernadina

This is another hopeful pick.  With the Shark back on the Opening Day roster, we’ve got high hopes that he’ll stick around for a while.  And when you’ve got Bill Ladson trying to force the name “Speed Racer” on twitter…well, he’ll have to live up to that somehow.  If the Shark doesn’t get a chance to munch on bases this year, expect to see Ian Desmond in this spot.


4) Who will lead the staff in wins?

Jordan Zimmermann

This was probably the easiest call we made.  J-Zimm is back and fully recovered from Tommy John surgery.  He has no innings limit (unlike Strasburg), and based on the glowing reviews of his shortened season last year, we can’t wait to see what kind of magic he makes.


5) Who will pitch more innings for the Nats this season? (Wang, Lannan or Detweiler)

Ross Detweiler

This was more strategy than anything else.  By the time we made our guesses, Wang had already been injured, and he has a history of being a delicate flower.  That leaves the choice between Lannan and Detweiler.  Lannan had options left, and considering the shocking fact that the Nats exercised these and are having him start in Syracuse, this pick is looking pretty good so far…


6) Who will get more at bats for the Nats this season? (Ankiel, Bernadina, Harper)

Roger Bernadina

This is another shot in the dark, and here’s the reasoning: Ankiel is injured, and also old (and seems to be a placeholder for Harper).  Harper is starting out in the minors, and while he will likely get to the Majors this season, he’s not going to play every day.  That leaves Bernadina – who is on the opening day roster, and will likely fill in for both Ankiel and the also-injured Morse, before slipping into a more utility-outfielder role.


7) Date of Bryce Harper’s Major League debut?

June 2

Fact: Maggie guessed this without looking at her calendar to see if there was a game being played that day, or even what day of the week that was.  Turns out it wasn’t a terrible guess – it’s a Saturday game at the start of a homestand against the Mets.  It potentially gives the team enough time with Harper in the minors to delay him being a Super-2, and would give the fans a lot of chances to see Harper play.


8) Which minor leaguer are you most interested in keeping tabs on this season (not Harper)?

Anthony Redon (or Matt Purke)

Rendon has a chance to make a splash this year.  He was highly touted and while his position (3B) is fairly locked up at the big leagues, it will be interesting to see him develop starting at Potomac and working his way up.  Other than Rendon, we’re eager to see what Matt Purke can do.  Lefty pitchers can be VERY interesting.


9) How many all-stars will the Nats have? Who?

2: Ryan Zimmerman, Stephen Strasburg

If Zimmerman bounces back from his shortened season the way we hope he can, he’ll be back at the all-star game.  And what sort of NL manager would be able to resist the name-recognition and electricity of Strasburg on their pitching staff?


10) Total wins and what place in the division?

85, 2nd

This is where Maggie and Ashley had their only real disagreement.  Maggie was more optimistic with 88 wins (probably because she was on vacation when she made her picks), and Ashley was more realistic with 82 (she was traveling for work).  We’ve split the difference at 85 and will keep our fingers crossed that this is enough to get the DC boys of summer into second place.


Essay: What is the single most important development for the Nats this season?

We read this as more of “will the team need to develop over the season to be a winning team”, so here’s that answer:

The team needs to stay healthy.  Physically, this includes trying to avoid silly injuries early in the season that could be avoided, and not overworking injury-prone players.  Mentally, the team needs to keep up camraderie in the clubhouse and not get caught up in the early-season hype until they’ve proven themselves on the field.

So…with all that said – what do you guys think?  Are we totally off base?  Agree with our picks?  Let us know in the comments.